文章千古事 疑案相与析——蜂螫马案的举证责任之我见  

Our Different Opinions on the Burden of Proof of the Case of Bee Stinging Horse

作　　者：周贤森[1] 周国君[1] 陈素花[2] 

机构地区：[1]福建省南安市政府法制办 [2]国立华侨大学法学院

出　　处：《蜜蜂杂志》2006年第1期37-39,共3页Journal of Bee

摘　　要：无过错责任原则的责任构成要件只包括违法行为(侵权行为)、损害事实和因果关系3个构成要件。蜂螫马案属于饲养动物造成他人损害的特殊民事侵权案,适用无过错责任原则,实行举证责任倒置,由被告就原告有过错或者第三人有过错承担举证责任。但违法行为(侵权行为)、损害事实、因果关系的举证责任仍由原告承担,而非被告承担。The factors of the liability of the principle of no-fauh liability only include three ones, offense or tort, the fact of damage, and causation. Since it belongs to the special tort in which the domesticated animal causes harm to person, the bee-stinging-horse case should be applied to the principle of no-fauh liability and the principle of reversal of burden of proof and justification. That means while the defendant holds the burden to prove that the plaintiff or the third party is faulty, it is still the plaintiff, not the defendant, who is assumed to shoulder the duty to prove the existence of tort, the fact of damage and causation.

关 键 词：蜂螫马案 特殊民事侵权 举证责任 违法(侵权)行为 因果关系 

分 类 号：D925.13[政治法律—诉讼法学]