检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西北工业大学航海学院,陕西西安710072 [2]海军工程大学电子工程学院,湖北武汉430033
出 处:《西北工业大学学报》2005年第6期725-728,共4页Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University
基 金:国家自然科学基金(60272077);航空科学基金(02F53030);陕西省科学基金(2002F17)资助
摘 要:根据信号相位匹配原理,提出了基于正则化方法的方位估计算法。该方法具有尖锐的搜索指向性,改善了接收阵个别阵元故障条件下的方位估计精度。海试数据的处理结果表明,该方法的定向稳定性和方位估计精度优于传统的波束形成方位估计和基于相位匹配原理的奇异值分解方位估计方法。There exists already a fairly good method based on the efficient SPM (signal-phase-matching) principle for estimating DOA (Direction of Arrival). We aim to present a more accurate estimation method, which, like Ref. 7, is based on SPM, but unlike Ref. 7, combines SPM with regularization method; more importantly, even when some of the sensors fail to work, our method can still give fairly accurate DOA results, but the method of Ref. 7 cannot. In the full paper, we explain our method in much detail; here we give only a briefing. We discuss the following three topics: (1)SPM principle and SVD (Singular Value Decomposition) algorithm for DOA estimation; (2)analysis of problems in DOA estimation; (3)Tikhonov regularization algorithm. Finally we give sea test data and analyze them. The analysis of sea test data shows: (1) when we used L estimation criterion of Tikhonov regularization algorithm, the 3 dB beam width was 1.8° and side lobe was lower than main lobe by 3.88 dB; (2)when we used GCV estimation criterion of Tikhonov regularization algorithm, the 3 dB beam width was 1.5° and the side lobe was lower than main lobe by 7.64 dB. The results show that the method proposed by us is better than that of Ref 7.
分 类 号:TN911.7[电子电信—通信与信息系统]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.15.158.134