非糜烂性胃食管反流病的治疗效果和成本分析  被引量:6

Quality of life and cost-effectiveness of different therapies for non-erosive reflux disease

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:刘芙成[1] 潘涛[1] 茅为涛[1] 

机构地区:[1]成都市第一人民医院消化内科,四川成都610016

出  处:《西部医学》2006年第1期40-42,共3页Medical Journal of West China

摘  要:目的评价非糜烂性胃食管反流病(NERD)的三种治疗方案对患者生存质量的改善及成本-效果分析。方法NERD患者118例随机分成3组。A组:埃索美拉唑40mg每日1次;B组:埃索美拉唑20mg每日1次;C组:法莫替丁20mg每日2次。3组都同时联用莫沙比利5mg每日3次,疗程均为8周。结果C组4周和8周的症状有效率都显著低于A、B两组(最小χ2=20.311,P=0.000)。A组与B组的症状有效率差别无统计学意义(χ2=0.348,P=0.555)。SF-36量表评分,A组和B组有5个维度积分较治疗前提高,而C组仅有2个维度提高。B组的成本-效果比在3组中最佳。结论对于NERD患者,埃索美拉唑20mg与莫沙比利联用可能为最经济有效地选择之一。Objective To evaluate quality of life(QOL) and cost-effectiveness of 3 different therapies for nonerosive reflux disease (NERD). Methods 118 NERD patients were randomized to 3 different therapies. Group A. esomeprazole of 40 mg, once daily; Group B.. esomeprazole of 20 mg, once daily; Group C. famotidine of 20 mg twice daily. All patients took mosapride of 5 mg, three times daily. The course of treatment was 8 weeks. Results Symptomatic effective rate of 4 weeks and 8 weeks in group C were lower than groups A and B (P〈0.05), and there was no statistic difference between group A and group B. Compared with group C, QOL in groups A and B had a striking improvement. 5 scales of SF-36 scores had significant improvement in groups A and B after treatment. Group B was most cost effective in 3 groups. Conclusion Esomeprazole Of 2 mg plus mosapride is perhaps one of the most cost effective therapies for NERD patients.

关 键 词:非糜烂性胃食管反流病 生存质量 成本-效果分析 埃索美拉唑 莫沙比利 法莫替丁 

分 类 号:R571[医药卫生—消化系统] R573[医药卫生—内科学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象