检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]上海市政工程设计研究院,上海200092 [2]西南交通大学土木工程学院,四川成都610031
出 处:《中国铁道科学》2006年第1期19-22,共4页China Railway Science
摘 要:针对主跨428 m的广州新光大桥设计方案,采用大型有限元软件ANSYS建立全桥三维有限元模型,分析横撑的数量和位置对弹性稳定和面外极限承载力的影响。结果表明,在端横撑位置确定的情况下,极限承载力随横撑数量增加先增大后降低;在横撑数量相同的情况下,端横撑位置对大跨度钢桁拱的弹性稳定和面外极限承载力影响显著,且端横撑的位置对弹性稳定的影响大于对面外极限承载力的影响。因此,在景观要求允许的情况下,端横撑应尽量向拱脚靠近。Based on a case study for Xinguang Bridge with the main span of 428 m in Guangzhou, a threedimension FEA model is established by ANSYS. The effects of the number and location of bracings on the elastic stability and the ultimate bearing capacity are analyzed. Results show that when the location of end bracings is determined, the ultimate bearing capacity will first increase and then decrease along with the increasing numbers of bracings. While the number of bracings is identical, the location of end bracings will influence the elastic stability and out-of-plane ultimate bearing capacity of steel arch bridges notably. The effect of the end bracing location on the elastic stability is more obvious than on out-of-plane ultimate bearing capacity. So if the landscape of bridge is permitted, the end bracing should be as close to the arch end as possible.
分 类 号:U448.224[建筑科学—桥梁与隧道工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229