维特根斯坦与梅洛-庞蒂“语言观”的一种尝试比较  

A Tentative Comparison Between Wittgenstain and Merleau-Ponty's Viewpoints of Language

作　　者：李菁[1] 

机构地区：[1]浙江大学外国哲学研究所,浙江杭州310028

出　　处：《自然辩证法研究》2006年第1期48-52,共5页Studies in Dialectics of Nature

摘　　要：维特根斯坦与梅洛-庞蒂对语言都做过深入的研究,语言问题在他们的哲学思考中都占有极其重要的位置。令人惊异的是,这两个分别隶属分析哲学传统和现象学传统的哲学家在语言观上却有着很大的交汇空间:坐落在生活形式中的“语言游戏”和源出于世界之肉的“语言之肉”其间有着诸多的相似,当然也有不同。它们都可视为是对传统语言观中过度膨胀的理性主义-逻辑主义的不同反动。这或许显示出分析哲学与现象学的某种殊途同归,也预示着西方哲学的一种新方向。Wittgenstain and Merleau-Ponty both have researched language thoroughly, and the problems of language are very important in their both philosophies. But what surprises us is that the two philosophers who belongs to the tradition of analytic philosophies and the tradition of phenomenologles respectively have many similar viewpolnts of language： Language-gainea that are related to forms of life and flesh of language that is related to flesh of world are very alike, nevertheless, they also have some different attributes.They are both against the excess rationalism-logicalism in the traditional viewpoints of language in different ways. Maybe it shows that analytic phihosophie and phenomenologies reach some same goals by different routes, and a new way of western philosophies.

关 键 词：维特根斯坦 梅洛一庞蒂 语言游戏 语言之肉 

分 类 号：B086[哲学宗教—哲学理论] B016