检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王青[1] 刘敬智[1] 顾晓薇[1] 丁一[1] 刘建兴[1]
机构地区:[1]东北大学资源与生态经济研究中心,辽宁沈阳110004
出 处:《中国人口·资源与环境》2006年第1期52-57,共6页China Population,Resources and Environment
摘 要:一个国家的经济活动产生的环境压力与其具有的环境承载能力。决定了该国社会与经济发展的可持续状况。因此.测度环境压力和承载力是制定可持续发展目标和政策的必要条件之一。基于国家尺度的社会代谢物质流、地理面积和生态承载面积。可以构建出一个国家本国环境所承受的环境压力总量指标体系——环境载荷和环境压强;德国、荷兰、奥地利、日本和美国等五个工业国家的环境载荷和各环境压强总量指标若干年的实证计算和对比分析。可以发现.虽然美国的国内环境总载荷、人均物质总需求及人均生态足迹赤字等均是各国最高者.其环境压强却处于五国的最低端。与奥地利相近;以环境压强指标测度。除日本不明显外.其余四国的经济发展与本国环境压力之间在研究期(1975—1996)均显示出“脱钩”关系.即本国环境压强并没有随经济总量的增长而增加。为此.最后就环境问题的公平性和环境压力指标的优缺点进行简要讨论。The environmental pressure created by a nation' s economic activities and the environmental carrying capacity of the nation determine the sustainability of the nation' s social and economic development. Measuring the environmental pressure and carrying capacity of a nation is, therefor, a necessary prerequisite for setting development goals and devising policy instruments toward a sustainable future for that nation. Domestic environmental loading and environmental stress indicators have been formulated in this study, based on the material flows of societal metabolism, geographical area and biological carrying capacity at the national level. The indicators were applied to Germany, Netherlands, Austria, Japan, and the United States and the results analyzed. It was found that, although the United States ranks the highest of all countries in indicators such as total domestic environmental loading, per capita total material requirement, and per capita ecological footprint overshoot, its environmental stress ranks the second lowest of the five countries and is close to that of Austria. When measured in environmental stress, four of the five countries (excluding Japan) exhibit an apparent decoupling between economic development and environmental pressure during the study period of 1975 - 1996, that is, their respective domestic environmental stress had not increased with their growth in GDP over the period. The issue of environmental equity and the pros and cons of the newly proposed indicators are also briefly discussed.
分 类 号:X24[环境科学与工程—环境科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222