检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李群英[1]
机构地区:[1]北京人民警察学院,北京102202
出 处:《北京人民警察学院学报》2006年第1期28-31,共4页Journal of Beijing People‘s Police College
摘 要:在我国,警察出庭作证十分少见。主要原因是:我国刑事诉讼法对警察的证人资格、作证义务没有做出专门、明确的规定;两大法系国家警察出庭作证的理论依据在我国法律中没有体现或者体现得不充分;传统的证据理论对证人、证言界定过窄。解决这一问题绝非制定一部法律就能一蹴而就,而应加强理论研究,完善相关配套法律,逐步建立起我国的警察出庭作证制度。In China, police otticers seldom appear in court as witnesses. There are three major reasons: 1) In China's criminal law, there's no specific and clear provision concerning the police's qualification as witnesses and their duties of testification; 2) The theoretical basis for police to be witnesses in the two great law systems has not been embodied in China's law, or at least not enough~ 3) Traditional theories of testification have only made a narrow definition of witness and testimony. To solve this issue properly, one new law is not enough. Instead, more theoretical and systematical efforts are needed.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3