检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:翟润蕾[1]
出 处:《河南大学学报(社会科学版)》2006年第1期117-119,共3页Journal of Henan University(Social Sciences)
摘 要:本文借用柏拉图的“洞穴理论”来解读和评论舍伍德.安德森的《小城畸人》。文章首先讨论了柏拉图在“洞穴理论”中对人类生存状态的分析对于理解和评价《小城畸人》有怎样的帮助,然后论述柏拉图对于真理的探求是如何在《小城畸人》中得以重现的。最后,文章分析了安德森的《小城畸人》在创作目的上与“洞穴理论”存在的差异,并通过这种差异探讨人们在不同的社会历史时期对生活的不同理解。Many similarities could be found if one compares Sherwood Anderson's Winesburg, Ohio with Plato's "Allegory of the Cave. " These similarities include not only images but symbols and thematic concerns. This essay, therefore, intends firstly to analyse and comment on these similarities, and by doing so find our way in understanding the various ways of small town lives in Anderson's novel. Further discussion would be made on how the pursuit of truth in "the Allegory of the Cave" has been practiced and eventually realized in Winesburg, Ohio. The last part of the essay would be mainly on the discussion of the different writing purposes between Anderson and Plato. It is hoped that, through such a discussion, different understandings of human existence due to different ages are decoded.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3