检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]山西医科大学,030001
出 处:《山西医药杂志》2006年第2期98-99,T0001,共3页Shanxi Medical Journal
摘 要:目的 评价和比较冷牙胶侧方加压充填技术和高温热塑充填技术对后牙弯曲细小根管根尖孔的封闭能力。方法 选取32个工作长度为8~10mm的新鲜离体后牙弯曲根管作为研究对象,16个采用冷牙胶侧方加压技术进行充填,16个采用高温热塑充填技术(ObturaⅡ)。设阳性与阴性对照,采用染色法比较根尖封闭能力。结果 两种充填技术根尖微渗漏差异有统计学意义,ObturaⅡ组明显低于冷侧压组(P〈0.05)。结论 高温热塑充填技术对后牙弯曲根管具有良好的根尖封闭效果。Objective To evaluate and compare the seal ability of root fillings following extracted human teeth using cold lateral condensation of gutta-percha or high-temperature thermoplasticized gutta-percha in vitro. Methods Thirty-two freshly extracted human mature curved canals of posterior teeth were obturated with cold lateral condensation (group 1 ) or high-temperature thermoplasticized gutta percha (group 2). The microleakage was determined by stained technique with India ink. Results The results showed that there was significant difference between groups 1 and 2 in mean depths of microleakage in root canals ( P 〈 0.05). Conclusion High-temperature thermoplastieized gutta-percha has excellent sealing ability on obturating root canal, so it is more suitable for clinical adaption than cold lateral condensation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.70