检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《现代口腔医学杂志》2006年第1期14-16,共3页Journal of Modern Stomatology
摘 要:目的探讨根管内折断器械的处理方法及影响取出因素分析。方法对86个根管内器械折断的病例,应用不同取出方法处理,总结根管内折断器械的取出效果。结果使用非手术方法,在器械折断的86个根管中,全根管和根管上部的折断器械38例,全部取出;折断器械位于根管中部的20个,13个取出;折断器械位于根尖部的28例中,6例取出。在使用非手术方法未能取出的29例中,18例通过折断器械建立旁路根管充填;11例行根尖手术取出并根管倒充填。结论应用适当的非手术方法,根管中上部的折断器械大部分可取出,根尖部的折断器械取出较困难,根尖部的折断器械可以通过根尖手术的方法取出。Objective To study the techniques about removal of broken instruments in root canals, and analyze the relevant factors. Methods Eighty-six cases broken instruments in root canals were treated by various techniques, and the results were analyzed. Results By nonsurgical technique, all of 38 broken instruments which located in top 1/3 of root canals and whole root canals were successfully removed; 13 in 20 broken instruments which located in medium root canals were removed; 6 in 28 broken instruments located in foot 1/3 of root canals were removed. 29 cases were not removed by nonsurgical technique, 18 in 29 were treated by root canal obturation beside the broken instrument, and the other 11 cases were treated by apical surgery. Conclusion by appropriate technique, the majority of broken instruments located in top and medium root canals can be removed, the broken instruments in tip of root canals were not easy to remove, apical surgery was another choice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222