检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广东省佛山市第一人民医院口腔正畸科,528000
出 处:《现代口腔医学杂志》2006年第1期17-19,共3页Journal of Modern Stomatology
摘 要:目的探讨替牙早期及恒牙早期两个不同矫治时机对治疗安氏Ⅲ类错的影响。方法选择26例安氏Ⅲ类错牙合患者,牵引弓联合前方牵引6个月,术前术后进行头影测量分析。结果26例患者的上颌骨移位均有显著性变化,SNA增大2.2°±0.3°,A点前移3.3mm±1.3mm,上中切牙切端唇向移动3.8mm±1.2mm,其中替牙早期组表现更多的骨骼、更少的牙齿改变。结论牵引弓联合前方牵引是简便、有效的安氏Ⅲ类错治疗装置,在替牙早期比恒牙早期取得更为显著的治疗效果。Objective To evaluate the effects of different treatment timings at early mixed dentition and early permanent dentition on Angle Ⅲ malocclusion. Methods Twenty six patients with Angle Ⅲ malocclusion were selected and applied protraction in combination with traction arch for six months. Cephalometric radiographs were taken before and after the treatment. Results Significant changes of maxillae moving forward were observed in all 26 cases: SNA was increased 2.2°± 0.3°, point A was moved forward 3.3mm±1.3mm, and maxillary center incisor was moved labially 3.8mm±1.2mm. Significant differences, more skeletal changes and less dental changes, were observed in early mixed dentition. Conclusion Protraction combined with the traction arch was a simple and effective treatment approach that plays an important role in the treatment of Angle m malocclusion. The treatment time of early mixed dentition was more effective than that of early permanent dentition.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15