检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:何明娥[1] 赵静波[2] 罗乐宣 解亚宁[2] 许军[4]
机构地区:[1]南方医科大学研究生学院,广东广州510515 [2]南方医科大学公共管理学院,广东广州510515 [3]深圳市福田区卫生局,广东深圳518048 [4]南方医科大学南方医院,广东广州510515
出 处:《南方医科大学学报》2006年第2期208-210,共3页Journal of Southern Medical University
基 金:国家自然科学基金(30100154)深圳市科技计划项目(200204166)~~
摘 要:目的探讨深圳社区人群应对方式的特点。方法采用简易应对方式问卷,对深圳社区5940人进行测试。结果深圳市民最常采取的应对方式是:“自己安慰自己(33.1%)”和“尽量看到事物好的一面(31.4%)”,不采取的应对方式位居前位的是“通过吸烟、喝酒服药和吃东西来解除烦恼(57.8%)”,不采取的应对方式多是消极的应对方式;深圳市民的积极应对方式的因子得分高于消极应对方式的因子得分,差值为0.43;深圳市民的积极应对和消极应对因子的得分均低于内地人群,差值分别为0.12和0.36,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.001)。结论遭遇挫折时深圳市民采取的应对方式相对积极,有利于个体的健康。Objeetive To investigate the coping strategies of the community-based population in Shenzhen. Methods Totally 5 940 subjects from the communities in Shenzhen were sampled and tested with the Simplified Coping Style questionnaire. Results The most common coping strategies adopted by the community residents in Shenzhen were "consoling themselves" (33.1%) and "looking at the bright side of things" (31.4%), and the least adopted coping strategy was "relieving distress by smoking, drinking, taking medicine and eating" (57.8%); the strategies left out from their choices were mostly negative strategies. The scores for positive coping strategy factors of community residents in Shenzhen were greater than those of negative ones, with a mean difference of 0.43. The scores of both positive and negative coping strategy factors of these residents were significantly lower than those of general population in other mainland cities (P〈0.001), with mean differences of 0.12 and 0.36, respectively. Conclusion The community residents in Shenzhen adopt mostly positive strategies for coping with frustration, which benefit their status of self-rated health.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3