检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《实用医技杂志》2006年第2期178-180,共3页Journal of Practical Medical Techniques
摘 要:目的:分析在没有独立运动准直器或不制作整体挡铅的情况下,采用一种改进的乳腺切线野等中心照射定位技术的优点和精确性。方法:用改进等中心照射定位技术和传统等中心照射定位技术手工计算剂量与计划系统计算的结果进行比较,说明其差异。结果:采用改进后的乳腺切线野等中心照射定位技术手工计算荆量与计划系统计算的结果误差在2%~3%之间,传统的乳腺切线野等中心照射定位技术手工计算剂量与计划系统计算的结果误差在3%~7%之间。结论:在没有独立运动准直器或不制作整体挡铅的情况下。改进后的乳腺切线野等中心照射定位技术是比较精确的定位方法。Objective To show the strongpoint and accuracy of the improvement on the technique of breast cancer tangent isoeenter irradiation orientation, There is not independent jaws or blocks, Method To eomparethe the handwork caiculated dose of the improvable technique and the traditional technique with the treatment plan system(TPS), To show their difference. Results The dose of the improvement technique was different from the TPS about 2%-3%, The dose of the traditional technique was different from the TPS about 3%-7%, Conclusion The improvement technique of breast cancer tangent isocenter irradiation orientation is accuracy. There is not independent Jaws or blocks.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.27