15FQ^+量表中文版信度与效度分析  

Analysis of reliability and validity of Chinese version of 15FQ+

作　　者：高宏杰[1] 苗丹民[1] 刘旭峰[1] 薛燕华[1] 刘练红[1] 

机构地区：[1]第四军医大学航空航天医学系心理学教研室,陕西西安710033

出　　处：《第四军医大学学报》2006年第4期359-362,共4页Journal of the Fourth Military Medical University

基　　金：全军"十五"指令性课题(02L003)

摘　　要：目的:探讨个性因素量表(15FQ+)中文修订版的信度和效度.方法:大学本科生1540名,分别进行相应量表的测量,包括15FQ+量表中、英文版以及中文效标量表16项人格因素问卷(16PF)、EPQ和MBTI,并对测量结果进行统计分析.结果:①15FQ+量表中文版内部一致性系数为0.61～0.80,重测信度(相隔4wk)为0.64～0.85(P<0.01);②中英文版本各维度相关显著(0.42～0.88,P<0.01);③效标关联效度表明,中文版15FQ+量表各维度很好地表征了16项人格特质;④因子分析各题目最大负荷值落在主因素上占75%～100%,仅6题目因子分析不理想.结论:修订的15FQ+量表中文版具有较好的信度和效度,可以在中国进一步推广使用.AIM： To assess the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of 15FQ^＋ （15 Factor Questionnaire plus）. METHODS： Undergraduates （n = 1540） were recruited to complete the related questionnaires, including the Chinese version of 15FQ^＋ , English version of 15FQ^＋ , Chinese version of 16PF （ 16 Personality Factor Questionnaire ）, EPQ （Eysenck Personality Questionnaire）, MBTI（ Myers-Briggs Type Indicator）and statistical calculation was made of the scores. RESULTS： The internal consistency reliability （Cronbach＇s a） and the reliability coefficients （test-to-retest, 4-week interval） of the Chinese version of 15FQ^＋ were 0.61 - 0.80 and 0.64 - 0.85 （ P 〈 0.01 ）. There was a significant correlation （0.42 - 0.88, P 〈 0.01 ） between the Chinese version of 15FQ^＋ factors and that of original English 15FQ^＋. The criterion validity study showed that the Chinese version of 15FQ^＋ factors efficiently represent the 16 personality traits. Factor analysis showed that the maximum loading of the items that fell on prime factors was 75% - 100% and only 6 items were short of our expectation. CONCLUSION： The Chinese version of 15FQ^＋ has a good reliability and validity and it can be extensively used in China.

关 键 词：15FQ^+ 信度 效度 人格特征 大学生 

分 类 号：B841.7[哲学宗教—基础心理学]