证明责任自由裁量权研究  

On Discretion of Burden Of Proof

作　　者：姜远志[1] 左佳[2] 

机构地区：[1]沈阳师范大学法律系,辽宁沈阳110034 [2]辽宁省委党校,辽宁沈阳110031

出　　处：《辽宁公安司法管理干部学院学报》2006年第1期48-50,共3页Journal of Liaoning Administrators College of Police and Justice

摘　　要：在民事诉讼中,如果案件事实真伪不明,法官要根据证明责任规则处理案件。在我国,法官拥有证明责任自由裁量权,当依据法律与司法解释无法确定证明责任分配时,法官可以根据公平原则和诚实信用原则,综合当事人举证能力等因素确定举证责任的承担。这项权力存在很大问题,公平不宜作为证明责任的分配依据,会削弱司法的独立性。同时,这项权力的规定不符合立法法的宗旨,也不存在适用的现实性。In the civil case in court, if the case facts is really false and not clear, the judge wants that the basis proves that the allotment rule of responsibility handles the case. The certificate responsibility that judge own cuts to measure the power freely is not fit, shouldn＇t weaken the allotment that the fair conduct and actions proves the responsibility according to, would the independence of the judicatory, at the same time, not agree With the aim of match the lawmaking method that non-entity apply.

关 键 词：证明责任 自由栽量权 公平 

分 类 号：D925.13[政治法律—诉讼法学]