检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国人民大学公共管理学院,北京100872 [2]中国人民大学法学院,北京100872
出 处:《上海大学学报(社会科学版)》2006年第2期124-130,共7页Journal of Shanghai University(Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目<证券欺诈的民事责任及其法律救济制度研究>(课题编号:02CFX005)
摘 要:证券争议仲裁是证券市场中争议解决的基本途径之一,具有更加全面、高效地保护投资者合法权益和缓解法院受案压力、促进多元化证券争议解决机制建立的价值功效。然而,由于观念、体制和立法等因素的影响,我国证券争议仲裁制度在实践中难以发挥其应有的作用。证券仲裁制度的立法完善,应当侧重于保护投资者合法权益,修改《仲裁法》、《证券法》,并制定《证券仲裁示范规则》,以指导证券争议仲裁实践。The arbitration of security dispute, as one of the basic ways to dispute settlement in the security market, has a great efficiency of value, which can safeguard investors' legitimate rights and interests more completely and effectively, alleviate the pressure of court case-accepting and promote the setting-up of multiple mechanism for dispute settlement. But, influenced by such factors as sense, system, legislation, our mechanism for dispute settlement has played an improper part in practice. To perfect the legislative arbitration in our country, particular emphasis should be laid on the safeguard of investors' legitimate rights and interests. What's more, The Demonstration Rules for Security Arbitration should be established so as to guide the practice, except from the modifying of Arbitration Law and Security Law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.135.201.186