检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:叶靖[1] 许乙凯[1] 刘岘 陆雪松[1] 许鹏君[1] 黄其鎏[1] 蒋志强[1] 吕国士[1]
机构地区:[1]南方医科大学南方医院,广东广州510515 [2]广州省中医院放射科,广东广州510102
出 处:《中国临床医学影像杂志》2006年第3期167-170,共4页Journal of China Clinic Medical Imaging
基 金:国家自然科学基金(30371608);广东省自然科学基金(020053)
摘 要:目的:探讨不同的给药途径对MR预定位免疫成像靶瘤性致增强作用的影响。方法:2组荷人结肠癌细胞裸鼠分别经腹腔和静脉注射SA-DTPA-Gd,检测各组肿瘤组织和肝组织的信号强度。结果:肿瘤在静脉给药后6h强化率达到最高(70.2%),而腹腔组中9h肿瘤的强化率最高(46.4%),两者之间具有显著差异;肝组织在腹腔组中峰值强化率为23.7%,而静脉组中最高为20.4%,两者之间差异不显著。结论:静脉给药更有利于肿瘤的SA-DTPA-Gd摄取并具有更为均匀的瘤内分布。Objective: To investigate MR enhancement of different administration routes in MR pretargeting immunology imaging. Methods: Two groups of mice were injected with SA-DTPA-Gd through tail vein(iv) and intra-peritoneal cavity(ip) respectively, and the MR signal intensity of tumor and liver was determined. Result: In iv group and ip group the maximum enhancement rate of tumor was 70.2% and 46.4% respectively, and there was significant difference. The maximum enhancement rate of liver was 23.7% in ip group and 20.4% in iv group, and there was no signifinant difference. Condusion: Intravenous injection is in favor of SA-DTPA-Gd's accumlation in tumor than intraperitoneal injection, and a more homogenious intratumoral distribution is archived.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.42