检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郑莉[1]
机构地区:[1]哈尔滨工程大学社会学系
出 处:《社会》2006年第2期18-33,205-206,共16页Chinese Journal of Sociology
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目(批准号为04BZX009);中国博士后科学基金(2005037711)资助
摘 要:英国著名的社会学家齐格蒙特·鲍曼在1989年发表的《社会学对后现代性的回应》(后收入《后现代性的通告》)一文中首次对后现代社会学与后现代性社会学进行了区分。鲍曼尝试用“社会性”、“栖息地”、“自我建构”与“自我组装”等概念分析当代西方社会崭新的人类状况。本文试图在阐述鲍曼关于后现代性社会学理论构想的同时,剖析这一构想所凸显的社会学在后现代状况下的理论定位及方法论问题。Zygmunt Bauman(1925-), a renowned English sociologist, distinguished postmodern sociology from sociology of postmodernity in “Sociological Responses to Postmoderniy” (1989) for the first time. For Bauman, contemporary western society is the new type of human realities, which has replaced the ‘classical’ modern capitalist society and thus needs to be theorized according to its own logic. Bauman attempted to analyze the new postmodern human conditions in current western society with the conceptions of sociality, habitat, self-constitution and self-assembly. Many scholars criticized his ideas. In this article the author explicates Bauman’s theory building in regards to sociology of postmodernity and analyzes the theoretical orientation and methodological issues of Bauman’s sociology in postmodern conditions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117