检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2006年第2期114-124,共11页Journal of Peking University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基 金:国家教育部新世纪优秀人才基金资助;山东省社科基金项目支持。
摘 要:本文在Stokey(2001)的两部门经济模型的基础上,建立模拟1750—1850期间私有制经济特征的经济模型来拟合于这一时期英国经济和中国江南经济特征。通过经济模型的研究来解释彭慕兰《大分流》所引发热论的关于工业革命发生可能性的系列问题。本文所建模型也可以看成Ramsey-Cass-Koopmans的经典模型的推广。模型揭示出文化制度差异可以导致‘分流’的发生。This paper rebuilds Stokey' s two-department model (2001) to simulate the character of the private economy from 1750 to 1850, on the basis of which to match the British economy with that of the Jiang Nan region of China during this period. Through the study of the economic model, this paper attempts to explain the wealth of questions regarding the outbreak of the Industry Revolution occasioned by Kenneth Pomeranz' s The Great Divergence. The economic model that this paper builds is in a way also a derivative of Ramsey-Cass-Koopmans' classical model. Its analysis suggests that difference in culture and systems between Britain and Jiang Nan of China may lead to divergence.
分 类 号:F061.2[经济管理—政治经济学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.23.92.44