检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广东省佛山市口腔医院修复,种植科,528000
出 处:《中国口腔种植学杂志》2006年第1期26-29,共4页Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology
基 金:广东省卫生厅立项资助;编号为A200271
摘 要:目的:比较种植体支持的磁性固位与快套式固位覆盖总义齿的临床应用情况。方法:22例无牙下颌患者按种植覆盖总义齿固位方式的不同分为二组,在戴牙二年后、四年后检测患者满意度、种植体周骨质吸收程度。结果:二组义齿的戴牙后满意度除固位力外无显著差异,但种植体周骨质吸收程度存在高度显著性差异。结论:种植体支持的磁性固位下颌覆盖总义齿种植体周的骨质吸收较少。Objective: Comparative study on clinical application Of implant supported magnetic retained and quick telescopic overdentures for the mandibular edentulous patients. Methods: according to the retentive type of mandibular overdentures divided 22 mandibular edentulous patients into two groups: satisfaction of patients , absorption degree of bone around implants were measured after wearing overdentures two years ,four years respectively. Resuits: Excepting retention of the overdentures , satisfaction of patients existed no differences between two groups, but the absorption of bone around implants existed significant differences between two groups. Conclusion: It suggests that implant supported magnetic retained overdentures seldom cause the absorption of bone around implants.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229