我国《合同法》违约归责原则的变迁及经济学检讨  

The historical and economic review of terms of breach of Chinese law of contract

作　　者：胡海涛[1] 

机构地区：[1]河北经贸大学法学院,河北石家庄050061

出　　处：《河北师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2006年第3期57-64,共8页Journal of Hebei Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

摘　　要：违约归责原则集中折射了一国评价违约行为及违约责任的社会经济基础和基本的价值观念。我国《合同法》之违约责任究应以“过错责任”抑或“严格责任”作为归责原则?围绕这一问题的学术见解可谓聚讼盈庭,直至今天,法学界仍然延续着上开命题理论上的不懈探讨。笔者不揣浅陋,试图借鉴经济学和制度学派的理论研究思路和工具对我国《合同法》所设计的违约责任归责原则之效率结果予以初步探讨,以期实现对相关理论研究的有益拓补。笔者认为,从预防违约损失的有效性、提高资源配置效率的角度,我国《合同法》应采行过错责任原则。The terms of breach reflect centrally the socio-economic infrastructure and basic concept of values, with which a country assesses noncompliance and liability of contract, What is the principle of liability in the Chinese law of contract？ And the general fault or strict liability？ Whereas it is heatedly discussed in the jurisprudential circle, this paper centers on a tentative study of the institutional efficiency of the term of liability in the Chinese law of contract by economic and institutional methodologies.

关 键 词：违约归责原则 过错责任 严格责任 有效预防 

分 类 号：DF418[政治法律—经济法学]