谁来解释法律——关于我国法律解释权配置的思考  

Who Interpret The Law

作　　者：魏胜强[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东大学法学院,山东济南250100

出　　处：《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》2006年第3期38-47,共10页Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law

摘　　要：在我国当前的法律解释体制中,立法机关、行政机关和司法机关都可以解释法律,带来了法律解释的混乱,引发了一系列的矛盾。无论是英美法系国家还是大陆法系国家,其法律解释权最终都掌握在司法机关和法官手中。我们可以借鉴它们的体制,结合我国国情,制定一部法律解释法来规范法律解释活动,明确赋予司法机关法律解释权,实现最高人民法院被动统一的法律解释与法官在个案中的法律解释的结合。In our current legal interpretation system, legislature, administration and judiciary have the right of interpreting law, which leads to the confusion of legal interpretation and brings a series of contravention. Not only in Anglo Aanerican legal family, but also in civil legal family, their power of legal interpretation belongs to court and judge finally. We can consult their system, according to the situation of our country, constitute the Interpretation Act, which impower the power of legal interpretation to the court, and then we can combine the unitive interpretation made passively by the Supreme Court to the separate interpretation made by the judge in individual law case.

关 键 词：法律解释权 司法机关 法官 统一解释 个案解释 

分 类 号：DF214[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]