检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:晋荣东[1]
出 处:《华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2006年第3期10-15,共6页Journal of East China Normal University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
基 金:教育部2005年度新世纪优秀人才支持计划项目
摘 要:历史地看,当代中国逻辑与现代化之间的内在关联首先发端于1978年提出的“逻辑为四化服务”与“逻辑现代化”等口号。如果说后一口号更多地是在强调逻辑教学与研究自身的现代化,那么前者注重的则是逻辑与现代化的历史进程的关系。在20余年的时间里,当代中国逻辑自身的现代化已取得积极进展,但由于逻辑学界对逻辑之工具价值的偏爱与对“现代化”、“现代性”等概念的片面理解,逻辑为现代化服务遭遇了严峻困难。为此,必须高度重视逻辑的社会文化功能,通过深入反思现代逻辑在规范性、合理性等基本问题的所见与所蔽,为推进逻辑现代化的健康发展以及参与现代性的构建与批判扫除理论障碍。Historically speaking, the interconnectedness between contemporary Chinese logics and modernization was revealed by slogans such as "Logics serving Four Modernizations" and "Modernization of Logics" put forward in 1978. While the latter paid more attention to the modernization of the teaching and research of logics, the former emphasized the relationship between logics and the historical process of modernization. In the past 20 years, the modernization of contemporary Chinese logics has been proceeding positively. However, it is still a question which merits attention that how the teaching and research of logics takes part in the construction and criticism of Chinese modernity by putting into practice their socio-cultural function.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.112