否定之否定:刑事第三审程序质疑观点辨析  

Denial On Denial:Discriminate View of Oppugning Criminal Procedure of the Third Instance

作　　者：牛振宇[1] 

机构地区：[1]河南科技大学文法学院,河南洛阳471000

出　　处：《时代法学》2006年第3期50-55,共6页Presentday Law Science

摘　　要：关于中国建构刑事第三审程序的合理性,目前存在着不少质疑之声,主要有司法资源有限论、最高法院无力负担论、第三审程序无效论以及当事人滥用诉权论。实际上,这些观点要么过于武断,要么属于因噎废食,要么对刑事第三审程序的性质存在明显的误读。Should the criminal proceedings of the third instance be formed in China？ Some persons don＇t agree, because they think that judicial resource is limited, the supreme court can＇t burden, the procedure will be of no effect, party maybe abuse suite right. In fact, such viewpoint is an arbitrary decision, or the character of the criminal proceedings of the third instance is comprehend by mistake.

关 键 词：第三审 司法资源 诉权 

分 类 号：D915[政治法律—诉讼法学]