检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广东省湛江市遂溪县人民医院,广东遂溪524300
出 处:《河北医学》2006年第6期568-570,共3页Hebei Medicine
摘 要:目的:雷贝拉唑钠10mg/d在消化性溃疡治疗中的疗效及安全性,并与奥美拉唑20mg/d进行比较。方法:采用随机开放对照临床研究。将消化性溃疡患者随机分为四组。A组:口服雷贝拉唑钠片每次10mg;B组:口服奥美拉唑胶囊每次20mg,每日1次;C、D组:在A、B两组基础上分别睡前加服雷尼替丁150mg。结果:四组患者平均胃内ph值,平均中位ph值,夜间平均胃内ph值、夜间平均中位ph值及症状积分下降率比较:C组和D组明显优于A组和B组;A组、B组之间,C组、D组之间无差异。整个试验过程中四组不良反应率分别为2.3%、2.6%、3.3%、3.1%,不良反应发生率相似。结论:雷贝拉唑钠10mg能安全、有效地治疗消化性溃疡,其缓解症状、抑制胃酸的疗效与奥美拉唑20mg相当。Objective: To evaluate the effect and safety of Rabeprazole Sodium 10mg/d in peptic ulcer treatment comparing with omeprazole 20mg/d. Method: Patients with peptic ulcer were randomly divided into four groups. A group took Rabeprazole Sodium 10mg/d, B group took Omeprazole 20mg/d, C and D groups each took Ranitidine 150mg q. n in the base of A and B. Result: The compare of average gastric ph, average median ph, average gastric ph at night, average median ph at night and decline rate of symptom integral in the four groups: C and D groups were superior to A and B groups, while there were no difference between A and B, or C and D. The side effect rate of the four groups were 2.3% ,2.6% ,3.3% ,3.1%. They were similar. Conclusion: Rabeprazole Sodium 10mg/d in peptic ulcer treatment were effective and safety, and the effects of easing symptoms, antagonizing gastric acid were similar to Omeprazole 20mg/d.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.31