颈动脉海绵窦瘘23例疗效探讨  

Evaluation of the effectiveness by interventional treatment for carotid arterial cavernous sinus fistula

作　　者：邵良[1] 武志坚[1] 蒋寅[1] 方俊[1] 朱晓江[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学附属第一人民医院,200080

出　　处：《介入放射学杂志》2006年第6期323-326,共4页Journal of Interventional Radiology

摘　　要：目的总结23例颈动脉海绵窦瘘﹙CCF﹚的临床诊治经验并探讨治疗策略。方法回顾性分析23例各种类型CCF的诊治体会,患者:Barrow分型A型14例、B型1例、C型1例、D型7例。结果20例经动脉入路,2例静脉入路,1例放弃栓塞治疗。9例采用单纯球囊行瘘口栓塞,5例直接行患侧颈内动脉和瘘口闭塞;5例采用NBCA胶栓塞瘘口;1例采用明胶海绵颗粒部分栓塞联合颈动脉压迫治疗;2例采用弹簧圈海绵窦内栓塞;1例单纯采用颈动脉压迫治疗。21例痊愈,2例好转。结论CCF具有复杂性、难治性特点,血管内治疗应作为主要治疗手段。Objective To summerize the clinical experience of 23 cases of carotid cavernous fistula （CCF） and discuss the treatment strategy. Methods Retrospectively analyzed 23 patients （11 males and 12 females） of CCF, including 14 patients with Barrow type A, 1 with type B, 1 with type C and 7 with type D. Results Vascular approach for embolization was undertaken in 20 cases by transarterial access and 2 via venous route while 1 case was given up. Among them, 9 cases obtained complete occlusion by simple balloon embolization and 5 were treated by direct occlusion of internal carotid artery. Another 5 cases used NBCA glue for the occlusion, 1 case was embolized by gelatin-sponge particulates combined with compression of carotid artery, 2 cases were treated by coil embolization of cavernous sinus and 1 case was only managed by carotid compression maneuver. We achieved satisfactory clinical results with 21 patients cured and 2 patients improved. Conclusion Complexity and refractory are the characteristic of CCF, and endovascular treatment should be the major choice of treatment.

关 键 词：颈动脉海绵窦瘘 血流动力学 病理生理 

分 类 号：R743.3[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]