检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《口腔医学研究》2006年第3期320-321,共2页Journal of Oral Science Research
摘 要:目的:比较光固化树脂、光固化复合体、光固化玻璃离子夹层技术修复楔状缺损的疗效。方法:60例274颗中、深度楔状缺损牙随机分成A、B、C3组,A组用光固化复合树脂,B组用光固化复合体,C组用光固化玻璃离子夹层技术修复楔状缺损,随访1年后疗效。结果:A组成功率83.7%,B组成功率94.6%,C组成功率95.7%。A与B、C组,P<0.05,B与C组,P>0.05。结论:在中、深度楔状缺损治疗中,光固化复合体,光固化玻璃离子夹层技术均优于复合树脂治疗方法。Objective: To compare the clinical curative effects with three different methods in restoration of wedge - shaped defects of teeth. Methods: Sixty cases of 274 teeth with middle or deep degree of dental wedge - shaped defects were randomly divided into three groups: A, B, C. Group A was restored by light - cured composite resin, the group B by light - cured compound, and group C by the interlayer technology. Evaluation of the clinical curative effect was made after restoration for one year. Results: The successful rate of group A was 83.7% ,group B was 94.6% ,and group C was 95. 7% (PAB 〈0.05, PAC 〈 0.05, PBC 〉 0. 05 ). Conclusion: The light -cured compound and interlayer technology are better than light - cured composite resin in treating middle or deep degree wedge - shaped defect of teeth.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.13