检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]江苏省泰州市中医院放射科,225300 [2]江苏省泰州市人民医院消化科
出 处:《影像诊断与介入放射学》1996年第2期80-82,共3页Diagnostic Imaging & Interventional Radiology
摘 要:本文对60例经手术及/或胃镜病理证实的中后期胃癌,进行了超声显像与X线双对比造影的对照研究。结果表明:X线对中后期胃癌检出的阳性率(95%)显著高于超声(81.7%)(P<0.05),诊断正确率(93.3%)同样显著高于超声(71.6%)(P<0.05)。对转移病例的检出,超声(88%)却显著高于X线(12%)(P<0.05),超声对胃癌浸润程度的评定亦远较X线为优。但超声显像不应作为诊断胃癌的首选方法。Sixty cases of intermediate and advanced gastric carcinoma confirmed histopathologically after operation or gastroscopy were studied with ultrasonography and X-ray photography. The results show that both detection rate (97%) and the diagnostic accuracy (93. 3%) of the latter are remarkably higher than those of the former (81. 7% and 71. 6% respectively) (P<0. 05). But for metastases, the detection rate of ultrasonography (88%) is much higher than that of X-ray photography (12%) (P<0. 05), and in the estimation of the infiltration ultrasonography is superior to X-ray photography. Ultrasonography should not be put in the first place to choose the methods in the diagnosis of gastric carcinoma.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15