检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:祁岩超[1] 杨波[1] 卢敏莹[1] 潘东晓[1] 罗超权[2]
机构地区:[1]广州医学院临床肿瘤研究中心暨广州市肿瘤医院,广州市510095 [2]中山大学医学院生物化学和分子生物学教研室
出 处:《中国肿瘤临床》2006年第13期774-776,共3页Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology
基 金:广东省科技厅科研基金资助(编号:2002C30305)
摘 要:目的:探讨CEA重组基因痘苗病毒(CEA-rV)对实验动物CEA阳性肿瘤的预防和治疗作用。方法:1)预防组:将实验鼠分为4组,先皮下接种痘苗病毒(1、2组野生型W-VV,3、4组CEA-rV)3次,再分别皮下注射同源鼠肝癌细胞(1、3组Hepa-CEA-,2、4组Hepa-CEA+)。2)治疗组:同样4组,先皮下注射肝癌细胞(1、3组Hepa-CEA-,2、4组Hepa-CEA+),7d后再分别皮下接种痘苗病毒(1、2组W-VV,3、4组CEA-rV)。以后每周测量一次肿瘤大小,并观察动物反应。结果:1)预防组:接种CEA-rV/Hepa-CEA+组各鼠在观察期限内无肿瘤形成,而3个对照组各鼠皮下均有肿瘤形成,并且以相近速度快速增长(肿瘤体积平均3.5cm3)。2)治疗组,接种Hepa-CEA+/CEA-rV组小鼠皮下肿瘤生长缓慢,瘤块较小(平均1cm3),而3个对照组肿瘤生长迅速,瘤块较大(平均5cm3)。无论预防组和对照组小鼠在整个实验过程中均未表现有毒副反应。结论:CEA-rV对实验性阳性肿瘤具有良好的预防和治疗作用,而且预防作用更佳。Objective: To study the preventive and therapeutic effect of CEA recombinant vaccine virus (CEA-rV) on CEA-positive tumors and evaluate its safety in a clinical application. Methods: In the prevention group (group A), 40 mice were divided into 4 subgroups, which were vaccinated by subcutaneous injection (SI) with wild-type vaccinia virus (W-VV) in subgroup 1 and 2, or CEA-rV in subgroup 3 and 4 for three times at 14-day intervals. The vaccinations were then followed by SI of Hepa-CEA^+ tumor cells in the 1st and 3rd subgroup or Hepa-CEA- tumor cells in the 2nd and 4th. In the treatment group (group B), 40 mice were divided into4 subgroups, which were vaccinated by SI with Hepa-CEA- tumor cells in the 1st and 3rd subgroup or Hepa-CEA^+ tumor cells in the 2nd and 4th respectively. These injections were followed by sI of W-VV in the 1st and 2nd subgroup or CEA- rV in the 3rd and 4th for 3 times at 14-day intervals. The animals' response was observed weekly after injection of the tumor cells in both Group A and B. In the clinical application study, 6 volunteers were vaccinated by SI with 0.5ml of CEA-rV for 3 times at 14-day intervals. The amount of serum CEA, tumor volume and the side effects were observed before and after treatment. Results: a) In Group A, the subcutaneous tumor grew rapidly at approximately the same rate (P〉0.05) in all 3 control subgroups (mass about 3.5cm^3 ), however, no tumor grew in the mice of the 4th subgroup in which CEA-rV and Hepa-CEA^+ tumor cells were injected. B) In Group B, the subcutaneous tumors were observed in all of the control subgroups and the tumors (mass about 5cm^3 ) grew quickly. In the tumors of the 4th subgroup that was injected with Hepa-CEA^+ tumor cells and CEA-rV, tumors grew slowly and the tumor mass was smaller (about lcm^3) than in the other 3 subgroups, between which no statistical significant difference was found (P〉0.05). The statistical difference was significant in the comparison of the fourth su
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.148.200.70