检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广东省口腔医院.南方医科大学附属口腔医院牙体牙髓科
出 处:《广东牙病防治》2006年第3期190-192,共3页Journal of Dental Prevention and Treatment
摘 要:目的评价ProTaper手动锉预备弯曲根管的临床疗效。方法将40颗具弯曲根管需行根管治疗的患牙随机分为两组:试验组用ProTaper手动锉及冠根向技术预备根管,对照组用K锉及逐步后退技术预备根管。两组均采用侧向加压充填法充填根管,用X线片评价根管预备的效果。结果ProTaper手动锉组无根管偏移、根尖堵塞、台阶形成、器械折断等并发症发生,能维持根管的弯曲度和走向,根管锥度和流畅度佳;操作时间短,且术后疼痛发生率低。结论ProTaper手动锉预备弯曲根管快速、安全、有效,临床应用价值较高。Objective To evaluate the effect of hand-used ProTaper instruments in preparation of curved root canals. Methods Forty teeth with curved root canards were randomly divided into 2 groups of 20 specimens each. One group was prepared by hand-used ProTaper with crown-down technique. The control group was instrumented by K-fries with step-back technique. The canals were obturated using lateral condensation technique in both groups. The efficiency of preparation and obturation of root canals was analyzed with radiographs pre-, during and post- instrumentation. Results No transpoxtation, apical blockage, ledge and instrument fractures were occurred with hand-used ProTaper instruments and the original curvature was maintained well. The operating time was shorter and post-treatment pain seldom occurred in hand-used ProTaper group. Conclusion Hand-used ProTaper instruments were proved to be efficient and time-saving in preparing curved root canals.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229