三种根管消毒剂对年轻恒牙根尖周炎疗效的对比研究  

The Comparative Study on Clinical Effects of Three Kinds of Disinfectant in Root Canal Applied to Young Ermanent Teeth with Periapical Periodontitis

作　　者：韩立显[1] 马新亮[1] 李惠鹃[1] 周洲[1] 盛晓文[1] 陆辉[1] 

机构地区：[1]淮北市人民医院口腔科,安徽淮北235000

出　　处：《潍坊医学院学报》2006年第4期291-292,共2页Acta Academiae Medicinae Weifang

摘　　要：目的观察比较改良氢氧化钙糊剂、木榴油抗生素糊剂(以下简称木抗糊剂)、樟脑酚液在年轻恒牙根尖周炎治疗中的疗效。方法经X线片诊断患根尖周炎的89例103颗年轻恒牙,随机分为A,B,C 3组,常规根管预备后分别用改良氢氧化钙糊剂(A组)、木抗糊剂(B组)、樟脑酚液(C组)进行根管消毒,观察临床疗效。结果改良氢氧化钙糊剂、木抗糊剂临床疗效较好,经统计学分析A组和B组的有效率差异无显著性(P>0.05),而两组分别与C组的有效率比较均有显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论改良氢氧化钙糊剂、木抗糊剂作为年轻恒牙根管消毒剂使用,效果肯定。Objective To compare the clinical effects of three kinds of disinfectant applied to young permanent teeth in root canal treatment. Methods Eighty-nine cases, 103 young permanent teeth with acute or chronic periapieai periodontitis were selected and randomly divided into group ealeium-idoform paste（ group A ）, group antibacterial paste（ group B） and group camphor phenol（ group C ）. The clinical effects were observed 10 days later. Results The statistical, results showed that the group A and B were better than grnup C in clinical, effects significantly （ P 〈 0.05 ） . Conclusion Calcium-idform and antibacterial offer the ideal and satisfaetory disinfectant of root canal and deserve to be chosen firstly for young permanent teeth with periapieal periodontitis in clinical treatment.

关 键 词：根尖周炎 根管消毒 年轻恒牙 

分 类 号：R781.341[医药卫生—口腔医学]