11例EPSPC临床分析  

Clinical Analysis of 11 EPSPC Patients

作　　者：王朝阳[1] 李桂生[1] 黄海欣[1] 黄东宁[1] 宁四海[1] 

机构地区：[1]广西医科大学第四附属医院肿瘤科,广西柳州545005

出　　处：《海南医学》2006年第10期25-26,共2页Hainan Medical Journal

摘　　要：目的对EPSPC进行临床分析,探讨其与PSOC的异同点。方法回顾性比较分析11例EPSPC与95例PSOC的临床特征。结果EPSPC与PSOC在发病率、发病平均年龄、体检发现腹部包块、B超发现腹部包块、MRI发现腹部包块等的阳性率方面均存在着明显的差异(p<0.05),而因腹水入院的比率、血浆及腹水CAl25升高的比率均未见差异(p>0.05)。其中,腹水、腹部MRI以及血浆与腹水CA125的表达水平对诊断EPSPC的阳性率分别为100%、100%、72.7%、81.2%。结论EPSPC与PSOC的临床特征并非完全相同,腹水、腹部MRI以及血浆与腹水CAl25的表达水平对诊断EPSPC最具有临床意义。Objective To explore the similarity and difference between EPSPC and PSOC with clinical analysis. Methods The clinical characteristics were analyzed retrospectively comparing EPSPC with PSOC. Results The differences of incidence, average age, positive rate of abdomen tumor by physical examination, B uhrasoud, MRI scan were significant between EPSPC and PSOC （p〈0.05）, rate of patiens with ascites, CA125 level in the plasm and ascite were the same （p〉0.05）. And the positive rate of ascites, abdomen MRI scan and CA125 level in the plasm and ascite were 100%, 100%, 72.7%, 81.2%, respectively. Conclusions The clinical characteristics are not complete the homology and the ascites, abdomen MRI scan and CA125 level are the most meaningful to diagnose the EPSPC.

关 键 词：EPSPC PSOC 临床分析 比较 

分 类 号：R737.31[医药卫生—肿瘤]