检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]辽宁师范大学教育学院
出 处:《中国心理卫生杂志》2006年第9期565-567,共3页Chinese Mental Health Journal
基 金:全国教育科学"十五"规划项目(BBB010467)
摘 要:目的:考察父母教养方式对3~9岁儿童自尊的影响。方法:采用3~9岁儿童自尊教师评定问卷和父母教养方式问卷对700名儿童进行调查。结果:(1)民主性教养方式与自尊总分呈显著正相关(r=0.687,P=0.000)。(2)父母在不一致性、溺爱性教养方式上的评分与儿童自尊总体(F=7.544,P=0.001;F=3.650,P=0.026)以及重要感(F=6.578,P=0.001;F=3.781,P=0.023)、外表感(F=4.418,P=0.012)、自我胜任感(F=6.132,P=0.002;F=4.989,P=0.007)维度存在显著差异。结论:民主性教养方式有助于儿童形成高自尊;相反,对儿童越溺爱、教育方式越不一致,则容易使儿童形成低自尊。Objective: To Explore the effect of parental rearing style on self-esteem in children from 3 to 9 years old. Methods: 700 children from 3 to 9 years old were measured with self-compiled Teacher's Rating Questionnaire of children's self-esteem and Parental Rearing Style Questionnaire. Results: ( 1 ) Democratic rearing style had positive correlation with self-esteem ( r = 0. 687, P = 0. 000 ) . ( 2 ) There were significance differences on children serf-esteem (F=7.544, P=0.001; F=3.650, P=0.026) and sense of significance (F=6.578, P=0.001; F= 3. 781, P=0.023), sense of appearance (F=4.418, P=0.012), sense of self-competence (F=6. 132, P= 0. 002 ; F = 4. 989, P = 0. 007 ) in spoiling and disaecording rearing styles. Conclusions: Democratic rearing style contributed to shape high self-esteem; conversely, spoiling and disaccording rearing styles were subject to low self-esteem.
分 类 号:B844.1[哲学宗教—发展与教育心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.157