检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:于群[1]
出 处:《河北法学》2006年第10期117-118,131,共3页Hebei Law Science
摘 要:公正合理的审级制度是最大限度地实现司法职能和法律价值目标的前提条件。而我国司法的行政化导致法院缺乏独立性;司法腐败和地方保护主义导致法官的不独立;再审制度导致裁判的不确定和司法权威的下降。现行司法的审级制度影响法院独立行使裁判权,影响司法公正,必须进行改革。对民事审级改革中各审级法院审理的范围方式,审查程序提出了具体的改革思路。Fair and reasonable trial class system is the prior condition to carry out the judicial fairness and the values of law. But China court lacks the independence because the administration of the judicatory; Judicatory corruption and the local protection turn to the independence of judge. The rehearing system causes judge to be undecidedly and descends the judicial authority. The current judicatory trial class system influences court dependence and the judicatory fairness. It must be refornled. Put forward the concrete reform way about each scope of different class court and investigating method and procedure in the reform of civil trial class system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117