从案外人的执行异议看我国的执行审查制度  

The Executive Reviewing System in China Viewed from the Third Party's Objection

作　　者：刘记福[1] 刘小红[1] 

机构地区：[1]湖南工业大学,湖南株洲412008

出　　处：《株洲工学院学报》2006年第5期49-51,共3页Journal of Zhuzhou Institute of Technology

摘　　要：我国民事诉讼立法虽规定法院组织机构设置应按“审执分立”的原则设立,但仅仅只是机构上的分立,在执行过程中,当第三人提出异议时,执行机构往往对实体问题进行审查,从而“审执合一”,这是造成我国“执行乱”、“执行难”的重要原因之一。笔者通过对我国执行审查制度在立法上所存在的缺陷进行分析,借鉴国外关于异议审查制度的相关规定,从而提出完善我国民事执行中案外人异议审查制度的几点设想。Although China＇s civil action legislation stipulated that the court and executive organizations be established in accordance with the principle of ＂separation of judging and executing powers＂, it is in reality just separation in terms of the organization. When a third party proposes a objection in execution, the executive organizations often judge in the entity questions and break the principle of power separation, which, among others, results in the ＂chaos and difficulty in execu- tion＂ in Chinese legal cases. This article analyzes the weakness in the executive legislation in light of foreign objection reviewing systems, and proposes some suggestions to better Chinese civil executive reviewing system.

关 键 词：执行审查制度 案外人异议 审执分立 第三人异议之诉 

分 类 号：F713.8[经济管理—广告]