检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:贾丽[1]
机构地区:[1]商丘师范学院经济政法系,河南商丘476000
出 处:《和田师范专科学校学报》2006年第5期48-50,共3页Journal of Hotan Normal College
摘 要:随着经济的发展,诉讼的数量和诉讼类型与日俱增,社会对于法院解决纠纷的要求不断高涨,原有的诉讼制度已无法有效的满足新的社会需求。世界各国特别是发达国家纷纷采取对策来解决这一矛盾,其中重要举措就是扩大(赋予)当事人的程序选择权。本文从当事人的程序选择法理基础分析入手,通过比较各国当事人程序选择权的立法例,分析当事人程序选择权在中国的运行现状,提出完善当事人程序选择权的途径。with the development of economy, the quantity and type of civil procedure increase rapidly, the society that the court system should settle disputes econemically and rapidly, but the current civil procodure system can't meet the needs of the society. Most of countries, especially the developed ones, ttke measures to solve the problem. In these measures, the option of civil procedures is important. Though the analysis of the jurisprudence bases of the option of civil procedures construction, the author co, pare ,and analysis the option of civil procedures in nany countries, including the present Chinese legislation. At last, the auth;r advise some suggestion so that the suggestion can improve the legistion in China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222