附带民事诉讼与刑民分诉的利与弊——以被害人权利保障为视角  

The Pros and Cons of the Subsidiary Civil Action or Separation of Civil Action to the Criminal Proceeding——From the views of defending the victim's rights

作　　者：王美丽[1] 

机构地区：[1]河南省政法管理干部学院,河南郑州450002

出　　处：《信阳师范学院学报（哲学社会科学版）》2006年第5期37-40,44,共5页Journal of Xinyang Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要：附带民事诉讼以解决被害人所遭受的民事损害赔偿为宗旨,能否最大限度的保障被害人的民事权利,应该成为构建该制度的一个重要标准。英美法系“分离式”的刑民分诉与大陆法系“附带式”的刑事附带民事诉讼,在解决民事损害赔偿问题上各有利弊。我国刑事诉讼法无论做何选择,都应将效率优先、权利保障以及法律统一适用三个基本原则体现在附带民事诉讼制度中。To solve the compensating for the victim＇s damages in the civil case is the aim of the subsidiary civil action to the criminal proceeding. To protect the victim＇s civil right is one of the most important criterions in constituting this system. Both the separation of civil case in the civil law and the supplement in common law have their goodness and defections in solving the civil damage compensating . The three basic principles, which are made up of efficiency, the protecting of right and the law＇s unifying apply should be embodied in the system of subsidiary civil action to the criminal proceeding in our criminal procedure law.

关 键 词：附带民事诉讼 刑民分诉 被害人 权利保障 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]