诉讼承担之既判力思考——对当事人恒定主义和诉讼继受主义的评析  

Thinking of Litigation Taking On to Have Already Sentenced-Review to Privy Forever Principle and Suit Acceding Principle

作　　者：赵沛沛[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京师范大学法学院,江苏南京210097

出　　处：《韶关学院学报》2006年第8期115-118,共4页Journal of Shaoguan University

摘　　要：在诉讼中,当事人转移其实体权利和义务,可以引起诉讼承担。此种情形下的诉讼承担,由于各国立法体例的不同,就可能存在既判力的主观范围是否扩张的问题。现理论界主要存在当事人恒定主义或诉讼继受主义两种不同的立场。我国在对待此类诉讼承担既判力问题时,应由双方当事人协商决定采纳当事人恒定主义或是诉讼继受主义。In suit, privy shift the reality right and obligation. It may cause litigation taking on. The litigation taking on will perhaps occur problem that have already sentenced to the subjective range of strength outspread because difference of legislation system of every state. Now, There are two different viewpoint to privy forever principle and suit acceding principle in theory. The article will estimate for two viewpoints. It offers that both privy must negotiate to decide to adopt privy forever principle or suit acceding principle on this oroblem in China.

关 键 词：诉讼承担 当事人恒定主义 诉讼继受主义 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]