实证方法在政治学研究中的限度——以行为主义政治学为例  

The Limits of Positivism Method in Political Research——Behavioralism as an Example

作　　者：叶娟丽[1] 

机构地区：[1]武汉大学<武汉大学学报>编辑部,湖北武汉430072

出　　处：《华中科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2006年第5期32-36,共5页Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：国家社科基金青年项目(04CZZ001)

摘　　要：社会科学包括政治学研究的实证方法是在近代自然科学迅速发展的背景下产生的,它在准确描述现象方面具有重要作用,但对揭示事物内在本质,则作用有限。而且,它内在的形而上学本质遭到了马克思恩格斯的批判。行为主义政治学将这种实证传统发展到了极致,形成唯实证方法,这种唯实证方法与历史上的实证主义一样,在政治学研究中也最终走向了形而上学。当然,这种形而上学因其所处的历史背景不同,而必然地带有一些新时代的特征,姑且称之为新形而上学。The Positivism employed in the context of mod exactly describing superficies Method in social science researc ern rapid development of natural , while being less useful in Furthermore, its intcrnal essence of mctaphysics had cncoun Engels. However, Behavioralism developed this Positivism tradi pure Positivism, This Positivism in story. hes, including political research was science. It played an important role in opening out the internal essence. tered with criticism from Marx and tion to a peak and formed a method of Pure Positivism was also making for a kind of metaphysics finally just like But, this new metaphysics was surely with some new characteristics for its different history backgrounds, which may be called New Metaphysics.

关 键 词：实证方法:行为主义政治学 方法论 新形而上学 

分 类 号：C03[社会学]