检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]浙江大学医学院附属第二医院,浙江杭州310009 [2]浙江省人民医院,浙江杭州310014
出 处:《杭州师范学院学报(医学版)》2006年第4期242-244,247,共4页Journal of Hangzhou Teachers College :Medical Edition
摘 要:目的测定胃癌患者血清中肿瘤标记物MMP-9,MMP-2,CA72-4,P53-IgG,MG7-Ag的水平,以评价其在胃癌的诊断和预测病理分型和转移及预后的意义。方法用双抗体夹心法测定血浆MMP-9,用ELISA法测定血清MMP-2,CA72-4,P53-IgG,MG7-Ag。结果上述肿瘤标记物在非胃癌组和胃癌组中的表达水平有显著性差异(P<0.01)。若以高于非胃癌标记物平均数加2倍标准差作为诊断肿瘤的界限,则五种标记物联合检测的敏感性为96.8%,特异性为93.8%。但胃癌的浸润深度、淋巴结转移、远处转移对各标记物的表达水平无明显的影响(P>0.05)。结论采用多种肿瘤标记物联合检测对胃癌的诊断有较大的意义。Objective To determine serum MMP-9, MMP-2, CA72-4, P53-IgG and MG7-Ag and to evaluate their clinical signifieanees including diagnosis, prediction of pathological type, metastasis and prognosis in the process of gastric cancer. Methods Sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to determine plasma MMP-9 and ELISA was used to determine sermn MMP-2, CA72-4, P53-IgG and MG7-Ag. Results The levels of the above 5 tumor markers significantly increased in the gastric cancer group compared with those in the normal group (P 〈 O. Ol ). If twice standard deviation above average level of 5 tumor markers in the normal group was considered as the diagnosis criteria of gastric cancer, the examination' s sensitivity of the five tumor markers combination was 96.8% and the specificity vas 93.8%. But the expression of the five tumor markers was not related to invasive depth or lymph node metastasis or metastasis. Conclusion Examination of combined several tumor markers is of use for the gastric cancer diagnosis.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229