2004年三种医学期刊论著中统计方法的应用状况与分析  

Use and Analysis of Statistical Methods in the Treatises of Annual Medical Periodical

作　　者：杨英选[1] 康洁霓[1] 陈广祥[1] 

机构地区：[1]沈阳军区卫生技术干部训练中心,辽宁大连116017

出　　处：《临床军医杂志》2006年第5期620-622,共3页Clinical Journal of Medical Officers

摘　　要：目的比较三种不同系列医学期刊统计方法的应用状况。方法采用单纯随机抽样法,对确定的2004年度公开发表的三种(中华、中国和军队系列)医学期刊中的全部论著进行调查分析。结果在三种系列期刊中,统计方法应用比均达90%以上(χ2=1.71,P>0.05),误用比分别为7.44%、13.39%和21.57%(χ2=9.35,P<0.01)。多因素分析应用比分别为14.05%、8.04%和2.94%(χ2=8.72,P<0.05)。计量资料和计数资料应用比无差异(χ2=3.45,P>0.05)。统计方法分类应用和误用百分比排序及统计问题分类误用百分比排序前10位存在不一致。结论医学期刊论著中统计方法应用普遍,但出现的统计问题或瑕疵也较多。Objective Being understood the used situation of statistical methods, the statistical problem and flaw is pointed out. Methods The investigating object of retrospective study is the all treatises in the three categories of Chinese medical periodical in 2004, which was determined with the simple random sampling. Results The taking ratio of statistical methods exceed all 90 percent in three categories （ x^ = 1.71 ,P 〉 0.05 ）, but the mistaking ratio is statistically significant （ x^ = 9.35 ,P 〈 0.01 ）. The taking ratio of multi-factor analysis is statistically significant （ x^ = 8.72 ,P 〈 0.05 ）. According to the statistical methods classifica- tion, the taking and mistaking ratio were ranged in percent order and the three categories are different in their sequence. Accordint to the statistical problem and flaw classification, the mistaking ratio was ranged in percent order and the three categories are different in their sequence. Conclusion The statistical methods were generally used, but the statistical problem and flaw has muoh affairs, and therefore the using standard need to improve in the scientific research of medicine.

关 键 词：医学期刊 医学统计 调查研究 

分 类 号：G255.2[文化科学—图书馆学] O212.1[理学—概率论与数理统计]