检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李卫平[1] 周海沙[2] 张立承[3] 吴华章[4] 王蕾[4]
机构地区:[1]卫生部卫生经济研究所,北京100083 [2]北京大学医学部公共卫生学院卫生政策与管理系,北京100083 [3]财政部财政科学研究所,北京100036 [4]中国医科大学社会科学部,北京110005
出 处:《中国卫生经济》2006年第10期17-22,共6页Chinese Health Economics
基 金:卫生部卫生政策法规司和WHO西太区办公室联合资助
摘 要:在分析4个调查县财政体制特点的基础上,探讨了财政对不同性质卫生机构的支持情况,分析了在财政投入不足的情况下各县卫生发展的不同路径。揭示了在各县卫生发展路径各异的表象下,以县、乡财政困境导致财政对卫生投入不足为逻辑起点,卫生发展走出了一条充分利用政策空间、以市场筹资为主但是机构效率并不高的路径。指出财政对卫生投入的重要程度和当地财力呈负相关关系。提出要扭转这一卫生发展路径,在筹资方面需要重新调整各级政府对卫生发展的事权和完善转移支付制度。The article introduced the fiscal system characteristics of the selected 4 counties and the government financing to the different health agencies and described the different path of health development in the 4 counties. Based on the positive analysis, the author inducted that lack of government financing for health sector was resulted from the distress of county level and township level' s fiscal system. As this logic starting point, rural health industry development walked along with the path of full use the policy, financing by market and low efficiency. And it was the negative corrective between the importance of financing by government and the local government fiscal revenue. To change this development path, the main body of financing must be changed, the health development responsibilities among all level governments should be adjusted and the transfer payment system should be improved.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.170