检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]山东师范大学教育科学学院,济南250014 [2]山东中医药大学,济南250014 [3]山东省日照市第一中学,日照276800
出 处:《心理科学》2006年第5期1132-1136,共5页Journal of Psychological Science
基 金:教育部人文社科专项任务(03JD880011);山东省社科规划重点项目(03BZZ05);"泰山学者"建设工程专项经费的资助
摘 要:使用结构方程模型,考察了学生班级集体效能、考试焦虑和学业成绩的关系。结果表明:1.重点学校学生班级考试焦虑极其显著低于一般学校。2.数学成绩和三科总分,高效能组均极其显著高于低效能组。3.在班级水平上,考试焦虑和集体效能、学业成绩均有负向关系,集体效能与学业成绩有正向关系,同时集体效能能够调节考试焦虑对学业成绩的影响。This paper explores the relations of Class Collective Efficacy, Test Anxiety and Academic Achievement Using SEM. The results suggest : 1. The key schools are signicantly higher than those ordinary ones on test anxiety among classes. 2. The mean of math and that of the sum of three key subjects in high-efficacy group are both extremely significantly higher than those in low-efficacy group. 3. At the class level, test anxiety is negatively related to both collective efficacy and academic achievement, and collective efficacy is positively related to academic achievement, while collective efficacy also mediates the effect of test anxiety on academic achievement.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.170