完全的实体权利消灭主义:我国诉讼时效效力立法的应然选择——诉讼时效基本理论的反思与我国诉讼时效立法的重新选择(之四)  

The Model of Absolute Extinguishment of Substantive Right: Our Choice as it ought to Be in Effect of Limitation of Action——The review of fundamental theory about limitation of action and our new choice when we revise the law (part four)

作　　者：魏盛礼[1] 

机构地区：[1]南昌大学法学院,江西南昌330047

出　　处：《河北法学》2006年第11期119-124,共6页Hebei Law Science

摘　　要：既有的关于诉讼时效法律效力立法模式中的诉权消灭、胜诉权消灭和不完全的实体权利消灭主义,存在理论上不可克服的内在逻辑矛盾。抗辩权产生主义的立法模式在法律逻辑上可行,但难以充分发挥诉讼时效的债权信用保障功能,与诉讼时效的理论基础不完全吻合,仍然可能对交易安全构成伤害。我国关于诉讼时效法律效力的民事立法,应当抛弃所有既存模式,以完全的实体权利消灭主义作为选择。在实行完全的实体权利消灭主义同时,可适度延长诉讼时效期间,借助于债法的不当得利和撤销权制度,弥补完全的实体权利消灭主义立法模式可能带来的不公平。The present legislative models of legal effect of limitation of action including extinguishment of fight of action, extinguishment of right to win a lawsuit and extinguishment substantive rights on the face, have logical contradiction in theory which is can＇t be explained. The legislative models of legal effect of limitation of action of producing right of defense is good in theory and logical, but in this model limitation of action can＇t play a full game in maintaining debt trust,and it is not accord with the theory foundation of limitation of action. The legislative models of legal effect of limitation of action of producing right of defense also do harm to trade safety. We should abandon all the present models and adopt models of extinguishment of essential substantive rights in our civil law about limitation of action. In the same time, the unfair of models of extinguishment of essential substantive right can be modified by the way of extending period of limitation and the function of unjust advantage and right of revocation in debt law.

关 键 词：诉讼时效 法律效力 立法模式 完全的实体权利消灭主义 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]