检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]复旦大学社会发展与公共政策学院,上海200433 [2]上海交通大学经济管理学院,上海200030
出 处:《管理科学学报》2006年第5期1-7,共7页Journal of Management Sciences in China
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(70341009)
摘 要:分析三阶段Bertrand-Stackelberg市场价格竞争与产品差异化选址策略,将之与Bertrand-Nash市场均衡进行静态比较;其次,构造一个具体的数字例子,演示随着产品差异化程度的提高,双寡头垄断市场中企业均衡利润的变动规律.在此基础上,识别经典的产品差异化定位博弈模型的各种假设条件,并在放松假设以讨论存在边际成本优势、消费者选择行为以及重复动态博弈的情形下,寡头垄断市场中的企业均衡利润和均衡价格的变化趋势及其稳定性问题.放松传统模型的假设条件有助于完整地理解和分析许多长期被孤立研究的产业竞争问题.This paper analyses the three-period Bertrand-Stackelberg market price competition and the strategy of product differentiation location, and makes a static contrast with Bertrand-Nash market equilibrium; then shows the influence of product differentiation degree in a firm' s profit change in equilibrium in duopoly market through a concrete example. Based on this, the paper identifies and relaxes the supposed conditions in the classic model of product differentiation location to discuss the varying trend and stability problems of profit and price in equilibrium in monopoly market where the advantage of marginal costs, the customers' strategic action and repeated dynamic game all exist. Relaxing the supposed conditions of traditional models is helpful to understand many industrial competition problems that have been studied separately for a long time.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.225