检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北大医疗集团平顶山第二人民医院,河南平顶山467000
出 处:《中国民康医学》2006年第21期952-953,955,共3页Medical Journal of Chinese People’s Health
摘 要:目的:探讨微创清除术治疗脑出血的方法与疗效。方法:60例脑出血患者随机分为穿刺引流组和穿刺碎吸组,并以30例保守治疗者为对照组,分析其有效率、死亡率及再出血率等。结果:穿刺引流组有效率85.7%,死亡率11.4%,再出血率8.6%;穿刺碎吸组有效率68%,死亡率24%,再出血率20%;对照组有效率56.6%,死亡率33.3%,再出血率26.7%。各组比较有显著性差异。结论:微创清除术特别是穿刺引流术治疗脑出血简便、安全、疗效显著。Objective :To explore the methods and effect of minimal invasive evacuation for the treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage. Methods:60 cases were randomly divided into hemorrhage drainage group and hemorrhage aspiration group, The control group included 30 cases with drug treatment . Then observe the effective ratio , died ratio, re - hemorrhage ratio and itc. Results: The effective ratios of the drainage group, the aspiration group and the control group were respectively 85.7% ,68% and 56.6 %. The died ratios of three group were respectively 11.4% ,24% and 33.3% and the re - hemorrhage ratio of that were 8.6%, 20% and 26.7%. Each group was significantly different. Conclusions: Itg of simplicity, 'safety and obvious effectiveness to treat hyperten- sive hemorrhage by minimal invasive evacuation especially hemorrhage drainage.
分 类 号:R743.34[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.44