检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:晋荣东[1]
出 处:《湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版)》2006年第6期32-38,共7页Journal of Hunan University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)
基 金:教育部2005年度新世纪优秀人才支持计划项目(NCET-05-0426)
摘 要:当代中国辩证逻辑研究的多元进路均不同程度地把辩证法作为研究的理论基础。基于“dialectic”一词具有的辩证法与论辩术的双重含义,当代关于论辩术的种种逻辑研究具有作为辩证逻辑的合法性,这种新形态的辩证逻辑对于深化马克思主义辩证逻辑的研究、把握辩证逻辑和现代性建构与批判之间的关系都具有重要意义。Different approaches into study of dialectical logic in contemporary China have more or less laid their theoretical basis on dialectic. Considering the double meanings of the term of dialectic, that is to say, Hegelian and Marxist dialectic, and dialectic as a kind of logical argumentation, this paper demonstrates the legitimacy of various logical study of dialectic as dialectical logic, and elucidates the important influences of this new type of dialectical logic on advancing the study of Marxist dialectical logic, and on grasping the relation between dialectical logic and the construction and criticism of modernity.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.158