限制民事诉讼沉默权的合理性及其立法完善  

The Rationality of Limiting the Right to Remain Silent in Civil Procedure and Its Legislative Improvement

作　　者：郭艺[1] 

机构地区：[1]广东商学院,广州510320

出　　处：《重庆工学院学报》2006年第10期53-55,共3页Journal of Chongqing Institute of Technology

摘　　要：民事诉讼具有不同于刑事诉讼的特点,沉默权在民事诉讼中并不是基本权利。从实践上看,限制民事诉讼沉默权更符合我国实践环境。但《最高人民法院关于民事诉讼证据的若干规定》第8条第2款规定的法律责任并不合理,损害了立法原意,应该加以完善。Because civil procedure is different from criminal procedure, the right to remain silent isn＇t the basic right in it. According to the situation of China, it＇s a better choice to limit the right to remain silent in civil procedure. But the legal liability stipulated in article 8.2 of ＂Several Provisions of the Supreme People＇s Court on the Evidence for Civil Actions＂ isn＇t reasonable and harmful to legislative willingness, thus should be improved.

关 键 词：民事诉讼 沉默权 法律责任 

分 类 号：D915.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]