“语义多重”与“符号自指”——英美新批评与结构主义文论的比较研究  

Ambiguity and Self-reflexivity:Comparative Study Between New Criticism and Structuralism

作　　者：支宇[1] 

机构地区：[1]四川外语学院中外文化比较研究中心,重庆400031

出　　处：《四川外语学院学报》2006年第6期3-8,共6页Journal of Sichuan International Studies University

基　　金：国家社会科学基金课题青年题目"西方文论在中国新时期的话语变形"(批准号:02WWC003)

摘　　要：英美新批评与结构主义文论都用语言学方法来研究文学性问题。尽管如此,二者依然存在着极其重大的区别。结构主义深受索绪尔语言学影响,将文本当作一种与现实世界无关的、“自我指涉”(self-reflexive)的符号体系,而新批评则认为文本与所指相关,具有“语义多重性”(amb igu ity)。Both New Criticism and Structuralism take a linguistic approach to the problem of literariness. In spite of this, they differ widely in their studies. Influenced by Ferdinand De Saussure, structuralism theory considers the literary text as a self-reflexive system of signs, which has no connection with reality. Whereas New Criticism believes that there is a connection between text and the signfied, and the literary work is ambiguous.

关 键 词：新批评 结构主义 语义多重 符号自指 

分 类 号：I0-03[文学—文学理论]