检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]解放军第一七四医院口腔科,主任副主任医师福建361003
出 处:《口腔颌面修复学杂志》2006年第4期256-257,共2页Chinese Journal of Prosthodontics
摘 要:目的:比较两种桩-核-冠(预成螺纹型金属桩核和螺纹钉树脂桩核)修复方法的临床疗效。方法:对近3年修复的113例前牙残根残冠的单冠患者,采用两种不同的桩-核-冠修复治疗方法。并经过2年的随访观察。结果:两种桩-核-冠修复方法在核冠钉松动方面存在显著差异(P<0.05),在防止牙根折裂方面无显著差异(P<0.05)。结论:预成螺纹型金属桩核-冠组,在防止冠钉松动方面明显优于螺纹钉-复合树脂核-冠组(P<0.05)。Objective: To evaluate the effects of the prefabricated threaded metal post-cores-and threaded metal post with composite resin cores for restoring anterior teeth. Methods: 113 cases of anterior teeth were restored with two kinds of post-core crowns in recent 3 years and were tbllowed up for two years. The clinical effects were compared between the two kinds of post-cores. Results: There was significant difference between the two posts in loosening of post(P〈0.05), and no significant difference in root fracture resistance (P〉0,05). Conclusion: The group of prefabricated threaded metal post-cores was significantly superior to the group of composite resin post-cores in clinic effect.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145