两种桩核在前牙修复中的临床观察  被引量:1

Evaluation of two kinds of posts for restoring anterior teeth

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:张翼[1] 付志英[1] 

机构地区:[1]解放军第一七四医院口腔科,主任副主任医师福建361003

出  处:《口腔颌面修复学杂志》2006年第4期256-257,共2页Chinese Journal of Prosthodontics

摘  要:目的:比较两种桩-核-冠(预成螺纹型金属桩核和螺纹钉树脂桩核)修复方法的临床疗效。方法:对近3年修复的113例前牙残根残冠的单冠患者,采用两种不同的桩-核-冠修复治疗方法。并经过2年的随访观察。结果:两种桩-核-冠修复方法在核冠钉松动方面存在显著差异(P<0.05),在防止牙根折裂方面无显著差异(P<0.05)。结论:预成螺纹型金属桩核-冠组,在防止冠钉松动方面明显优于螺纹钉-复合树脂核-冠组(P<0.05)。Objective: To evaluate the effects of the prefabricated threaded metal post-cores-and threaded metal post with composite resin cores for restoring anterior teeth. Methods: 113 cases of anterior teeth were restored with two kinds of post-core crowns in recent 3 years and were tbllowed up for two years. The clinical effects were compared between the two kinds of post-cores. Results: There was significant difference between the two posts in loosening of post(P〈0.05), and no significant difference in root fracture resistance (P〉0,05). Conclusion: The group of prefabricated threaded metal post-cores was significantly superior to the group of composite resin post-cores in clinic effect.

关 键 词:预成桩核 螺纹桩钉 复合树脂 

分 类 号:R783.3[医药卫生—口腔医学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象